EM Applications of ElectromagneticsBuilt using ChatGPT · Connected engineering reference
Home Measurements & Instruments
On this page

Measurements & Instruments

30-second intuitionA theoretical quantity becomes useful only when you know what instrument measures it, what calibration establishes its scale, what bandwidth is implied, and what uncertainty or systematic error can corrupt it.

Measurement map

Quantity Typical instrument / method Main caveat
$S_{11},S_{21}$ Vector network analyzer (VNA) calibration plane, cables, fixtures
Spectrum / harmonics / spurs Spectrum analyzer RBW/VBW, detector, overload
EVM / constellation / demodulation Vector signal analyzer (VSA) reference model, equalization, phase noise
Time waveform / pulse Oscilloscope analog BW, sample rate, probe loading
RF power Power meter / calibrated sensor sensor range, mismatch, crest factor
Noise figure Noise source + analyzer / Y-factor ENR calibration, gain stability
Antenna gain/pattern Anechoic range / near-field scanner far-field criterion, chamber reflections
Electric field calibrated isotropic probe / antenna / atomic sensor perturbation, polarization, calibration
Magnetic field Hall, fluxgate, search coil, OPM bandwidth, offset, orientation
Optical transmission photodiode + TIA responsivity, linearity, bandwidth
Optical frequency wavemeter / comb / reference spectroscopy absolute calibration, drift

1. Vector network analyzer

A VNA measures complex traveling-wave ratios. For a two-port device,

\[\begin{bmatrix}b_1\\b_2\end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}S_{11}&S_{12}\\S_{21}&S_{22}\end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix}a_1\\a_2\end{bmatrix}.\]

Practical workflow

  1. Choose frequency span, IF bandwidth, power, averaging and number of points.
  2. Warm up cables and fixtures if precision matters.
  3. Calibrate at the desired reference plane: SOLT, TRL, ECal or another suitable method.
  4. Verify calibration with a known standard or thru.
  5. Measure the DUT without changing cable geometry unnecessarily.
  6. Save complex data, not just screenshots.
Engineering realityA beautiful $S_{11}$ trace can mostly describe your fixture if the calibration plane is wrong. At mmWave, connector repeatability, cable flexure and launch design can dominate.

2. Spectrum analyzer

Use a spectrum analyzer for carrier power, harmonics, spurious emissions, occupied bandwidth, phase-noise-related skirts and interference searches.

Key settings:

A narrower RBW reduces displayed noise power approximately with $10\log_{10}B$, but also slows measurement and may hide fast events.

3. Vector signal analysis and EVM

A VSA demodulates a known modulation format. Error vector magnitude is conceptually

\[\mathrm{EVM}_{RMS}= \sqrt{\frac{\sum_k|S_k-S_{k,ref}|^2}{\sum_k|S_{k,ref}|^2}}.\]

EVM is a compact metric that can include amplifier nonlinearity, IQ imbalance, phase noise, frequency error, noise, compression and channel effects. Interpretation depends strongly on the equalization and reference definitions used.

4. Oscilloscope

An oscilloscope connects electromagnetic systems to time-domain behavior: pulses, envelopes, beat notes, transients, switching, detector signals and TIA outputs.

Useful rules:

For a nominally Gaussian system, a rough rise-time relation is

\[t_r\approx\frac{0.35}{BW}.\]

5. RF power measurement

Power meters are often more accurate than spectrum analyzers for absolute average power. Directional couplers allow forward/reflected measurements in high-power paths.

Mismatch uncertainty matters because source and sensor reflection coefficients interact. For pulsed/high-PAPR signals, ensure the sensor supports the waveform’s crest factor and bandwidth.

6. Noise figure

For the Y-factor method,

\[Y=\frac{P_{hot}}{P_{cold}},\]

combined with the calibrated excess-noise ratio of the source. Noise-figure work is sensitive to source ENR calibration, connector loss, gain variation, image responses and analyzer noise floor.

7. Antenna patterns, gain and efficiency

Far-field range

A common criterion is

\[R_{FF}\gtrsim\frac{2D^2}{\lambda}.\]

Measure amplitude and phase versus angle with a calibrated source/receive geometry.

Near-field scanning

Planar, cylindrical or spherical near-field measurements can be transformed computationally to the far field. This is invaluable when the required far-field distance is impractically large.

OTA systems

Modern wireless devices are often evaluated over the air because the antenna, enclosure, transceiver and beamforming algorithms behave as one coupled system.

8. EMC and compliance measurement

EMC measurements usually separate into:

Instrumentation can include LISNs, current probes, CDN/BCI fixtures, antennas, preamplifiers, spectrum/EMI receivers, RF power amplifiers, field probes and chambers.

A compliance result is not just a spectrum: detector type, bandwidth, distance, antenna factor, cable loss, preamplifier gain and chamber/site validation all matter.

9. Electric-field measurement

Possible methods include:

For an antenna-factor method,

\[E=AF\,V\]

under the calibration convention used. Probe perturbation, polarization, near-field structure and spatial averaging can dominate uncertainty.

10. Magnetic-field measurement

11. Optical readout for atomic systems

A common chain is

\[\text{atom-field interaction}\rightarrow \text{optical susceptibility}\rightarrow \text{transmission / phase / polarization}\rightarrow \text{photodetector}\rightarrow \text{TIA}\rightarrow \text{digitizer}.\]

Measure and record:

12. Calibration hierarchy

A strong experiment separates instrument calibration from physical-model calibration.

Examples:

13. Measurement uncertainty

For independent input quantities $x_i$, first-order uncertainty propagation is

\[u_y^2\approx\sum_i\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_i}\right)^2u_{x_i}^2.\]

In practice, distinguish:

14. A reusable measurement checklist

EMI/EMC · RF & Microwave · Antennas · Ground-State Magnetometry · Rydberg Semiclassical Optics · Theory ↔ Experiment