On this page
Electromagnetic Boundary Conditions
Consider an interface with unit normal $\hat n$ from medium 1 to medium 2.
Tangential electric field
\[\boxed{\hat n\times(\mathbf E_2-\mathbf E_1)=0}\]for ordinary interfaces without an imposed singular magnetic surface current.
Tangential magnetic field
\[\boxed{\hat n\times(\mathbf H_2-\mathbf H_1)=\mathbf J_s}\]where $\mathbf J_s$ is surface current density.
Normal electric flux density
\[\boxed{\hat n\cdot(\mathbf D_2-\mathbf D_1)=\rho_s}\]where $\rho_s$ is free surface charge density.
Normal magnetic flux density
\[\boxed{\hat n\cdot(\mathbf B_2-\mathbf B_1)=0.}\]Perfect electric conductor
Inside an ideal PEC in steady sinusoidal electromagnetics,
\[\mathbf E=0.\]At its surface,
\[\mathbf E_t=0,\]and surface current supplies the discontinuity in tangential $\mathbf H$.
These conditions explain waveguide walls, cavity modes, shielding currents and image theory.
Reflection and refraction
Boundary conditions applied to incident, reflected and transmitted plane waves yield Fresnel coefficients and Snell’s law. At normal incidence between lossless media,
\[\Gamma=\frac{\eta_2-\eta_1}{\eta_2+\eta_1}.\]Thus impedance mismatch is fundamentally an interface/boundary-condition problem.
Worked example — air to dielectric
Suppose a nonmagnetic dielectric has $\epsilon_r=4$. Then
\[\eta_2\approx\frac{377}{\sqrt{4}}\approx188.5\ \Omega.\]From air,
\[\Gamma\approx\frac{188.5-377}{188.5+377}=-\frac13.\]| The reflected electric-field amplitude is about one-third of the incident field with a phase reversal; reflected power is $ | \Gamma | ^2\approx11.1\%$. |
Engineering reality
Measurement
Interface behavior is commonly characterized using VNA reflection/transmission, free-space material measurements, resonant cavities, ellipsometry and optical reflectometry.
References
- J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics.
- D. M. Pozar, Microwave Engineering.
- C. A. Balanis, Advanced Engineering Electromagnetics.
Related: Electromagnetic Waves · RF & Microwave · Optics